Quant (QNT) Technical Analysis

• Current price: Quant (QNT) is trading at $169.18 as of the latest 15m snapshot.
• Overall sentiment: The combined technical (score 48) and on-chain (score 50) readings are near neutral, but all detectable chart patterns across 15m, 30m, 1h, and 4h timeframes carry a bearish direction, tilting the aggregate view toward caution.
• Lower-timeframe conflict/confirmation: Both the 15m and 30m charts show bearish wedge formations with valid downside targets, confirming short-term selling pressure without intra-timeframe conflict.
• Key risk: The analysis prices used for pattern detection (15m: $169.18, 30m: $180.64, 1h: $124.23, 4h: $99.02) diverge significantly from each other, suggesting the pattern data may be drawn from different chart snapshots. This inconsistency reduces the reliability of the projected targets.

Quant’s current price of $169.18 represents a 2.46% gain over the past 24 hours, per the stored price change metric. The technical score of 48 is derived from a composite of 15 indicators, with notable readings including RSI at 66 (mildly overbought on the 1h timeframe), MACD at 45 (slightly bearish), and Bollinger Bands at 27 (suggesting low volatility). The on-chain score of 50 is based on a DefiLlama snapshot that reports no fees, TVL, DEX volume, or stablecoin data — effectively a neutral placeholder. The absence of fundamental and social scores (both null) means the analysis rests almost entirely on technical patterns and indicators.

• Important nuances: The overall technical score of 48 sits just below the neutral 50 midpoint, reflecting a slight bearish tilt across indicators. The on-chain score is exactly 50, indicating no directional bias from blockchain data. However, the on-chain snapshot is largely empty — most fields are null, and only 6 metrics are filled, all with zero values. This limits the depth of fundamental context.

• Important nuances: Both timeframes show a pattern score of 50 (neutral) but with significant_pattern set to true. The 15m analysis price ($169.18) matches the current price, while the 30m analysis price ($180.64) is higher — a discrepancy that may reflect different chart snapshots. The 15m RSI is 66 (elevated) and MACD is 7 (deeply bearish), while the 30m RSI is 36 (oversold) and MACD is 15 (bearish). This creates a mixed short-term momentum picture despite aligned pattern directions.

The 15m timeframe detects three Wedge patterns (small, medium, large) with a total of 6 lines. The pattern score is 50, which is exactly neutral — the system does not assign a strong directional conviction, but the arrow direction is down with a valid target of $98.41 (below the analysis price of $169.18). The technical score for 15m is 43, below the neutral midpoint, indicating that the indicator suite leans bearish. Key indicator extremes: MACD at 7 (very bearish), CCI at 18 (oversold), and Stochastic at 61 (neutral). The bearish wedge patterns and the downside arrow align with the low technical score.

The 30m timeframe also shows three Wedge patterns (small, medium, large) with 5 lines. The pattern score is again 50 (neutral), but the arrow direction is down with a valid target of $113.67 (below the analysis price of $180.64). The 30m technical score is 46, slightly below neutral. Notable indicators: RSI at 36 (oversold), MACD at 15 (bearish), and Stochastic at 22 (oversold). The oversold RSI and Stochastic on the 30m contrast with the 15m’s elevated RSI, indicating a short-term conflict in momentum. However, both timeframes agree on a bearish pattern bias.

• Important nuances: The 1h analysis price ($124.23) is significantly below the current price ($169.18), while the 4h analysis price ($99.02) is even lower. This suggests the higher timeframe patterns were drawn from older data. Both timeframes have pattern scores of 50 (neutral) but significant_pattern true, with bearish arrows. The 1h technical score is 48 (neutral), while the 4h technical score is 53 (slightly bullish), creating a conflict between pattern direction and the 4h indicator composite.

The 1h chart contains two patterns: a Channel (medium) and a Wedge (large), with 4 lines. The pattern score is 50, neutral, but the arrow points down with a valid target of $77.50 (below the analysis price of $124.23). The 1h technical score is 48, just below neutral. Key indicators: RSI at 66 (elevated), MACD at 45 (neutral), and Bollinger Bands at 27 (low volatility). The bearish pattern target conflicts with the elevated RSI, which typically suggests overbought conditions that could precede a pullback — consistent with the bearish arrow.

The 4h chart detects two Wedge patterns (medium and large) with 6 lines. The pattern score is 50 (neutral), arrow direction down, with a valid target of $77.71 (below the analysis price of $99.02). The 4h technical score is 53, slightly above neutral, indicating a mild bullish lean from the indicator suite. This is a divergence: the pattern suggests downside, but the composite technical score (driven by EMA at 86, Ichimoku at 75, OBV at 67) leans positive. The 4h RSI is 43 (neutral-bearish) and MACD is 37 (bearish), partially reconciling the divergence.

For a crypto asset like Quant, the absence of on-chain data — no chain TVL, no DEX volume, no fee trends — leaves a critical gap in fundamental analysis. The only available on-chain metrics are three activity scores (all zero) and stablecoin netflow values (also zero for 24h, 7d, 30d). This suggests either low on-chain activity or incomplete data coverage. The risk is that price action is being driven by off-exchange factors (e.g., sentiment, news) that are not captured in the stored data. Traders should be aware that the on-chain picture is essentially a blank slate.

• Important nuances: The on-chain snapshot from DefiLlama (dated 2026-08-11) contains almost no usable data. All fee, TVL, DEX volume, stablecoin, and derivative fields are null. The on-chain score of 50 is a default neutral value based on 6 filled metrics, all of which are zero (dex_activity_score, capital_velocity_score, economic_activity_score, stablecoin_netflow fields). This means on-chain context provides no actionable insight.

Confirmation triggers (bearish):

Invalidation triggers:

• Important nuances: All four timeframes have valid downside targets, but the analysis prices differ widely. The most immediate trigger comes from the 15m chart, where the current price ($169.18) matches the analysis price. The 30m, 1h, and 4h targets are based on older snapshots and may not be directly applicable to current levels.
• A break below the 15m support line (slope -0.01035) near the current price could confirm the wedge breakdown and open the path toward the 15m target of $98.41.
• Sustained trading below the 30m analysis price of $180.64 would keep the 30m target of $113.67 in play.
• On the 1h, a move below $124.23 (the analysis price) would validate the channel/wedge breakdown toward $77.50.
• On the 4h, a break below $99.02 would target $77.71.
• A decisive move above the 15m resistance (slope -0.0258) would negate the immediate bearish setup.
• If price reclaims the 30m analysis price of $180.64, the bearish wedge on that timeframe would be invalidated.
• On higher timeframes, reclaiming $124.23 (1h) or $99.02 (4h) would invalidate those patterns.

Short-term (days to a week): The data leans bearish. The 15m and 30m patterns both point lower, and the 15m technical score of 43 supports a cautious view. However, the 30m oversold RSI (36) and Stochastic (22) suggest the selling pressure may be exhausted in the very near term, creating a potential for a short-term bounce before further downside. The setup does not yet support a confident short entry at current levels; a break below the 15m support would provide clearer confirmation.

Long-term (weeks to months): The higher timeframe patterns (1h and 4h) are also bearish, but their analysis prices are far below the current price, indicating they were drawn from different market conditions. The 4h technical score of 53 (slightly bullish) introduces a conflict. A cautious interpretation is that the long-term bias is uncertain — the pattern data suggests downside potential, but the indicator divergence and stale analysis prices reduce conviction. The lack of on-chain fundamentals further weakens any long-term directional thesis. The data does not yet support a strong long-term bullish or bearish view; continued monitoring of price action relative to the 15m and 30m levels is warranted.

For the latest data and interactive charts, visit the Quant analysis hub.